News items of interest:
Friday, August
13th, 2004
A Warning From the ACLU: Emerging
“Surveillance-Industrial Complex” Is Turbo-Charging Government
Monitoring
RESOLVING TO
RESIST:
Local governments are refusing to
comply with the Patriot Act
by Elaine Scarry
http://bostonreview.net/BR29.1/scarry.html
"In the two years since its passage by
Congress ... the U.S.A. Patriot
Act has become the locus of resistance against the unceasing injuries
of the Bush-Rumsfeld-Ashcroft triumvirate, as first one community, then
two, then eleven, then 27, then 238 have passed resolutions against it,
as have three state legislatures. Many more councils and legislatures
have draft resolutions pending. The letters U.S.A. and the word patriot
have gradually reacquired their earlier solidity and sufficiency, as
local and state egovernments reanimate the practice of self-rule by
opposing the Patriot Act's assault on the personal privacy, free flow
of information, and freedom of association that lie at the heart of
democracy. Each of the resolutions affirms the town's obligation to
uphold the constitutional rights of all persons who live there, and
many of them explicitly direct police and other residents to refrain
from carrying out the provisions of the Patriot Act, even when
approached by a federal officer and explicitly instruceted to do so."
A Heavy Burden at
the Border
Residents on Maine-Quebec line frightened, frustrated after man is
fined $10,000 for crossing
By
Rachel Rice, Of the Bangor Daily NEWS Staff
Last updated: Saturday, February 7, 2004
TOWNSHIP 15 RANGE 15 - Richard Albert
knew customs officials were
tightening security along the Maine-Quebec border, but he never thought
that coming home from church would cost him $10,000.
Albert, 52, was born and raised in Township 15 Range 15. He works for
Robinson Lumber Co., located in the unorganized territory.
Albert's
house, where he lives alone, is just 30 yards from the border, right
beside the U.S. Customs office. He has been crossing the U.S.-Canada
border at his own discretion for more than 40 years, he said in an
interview on Tuesday.
In mid-January, he received two $5,000
fines from the U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection for
crossing the Quebec border into Maine twice on a Sunday, a day when the
local border station is closed.
"I was coming home from church
like I do every Sunday," he said. "They [customs officials] said I was
caught on tape re-entering the U.S.
Federal
Judge Rules Part of
Patriot Act Unconstitutional
The Associated Press
Monday, January 26, 2004; 2:49 PM
LOS ANGELES -- A federal judge has
declared
unconstitutional a portion of the USA Patriot Act that bars giving
expert advice or assistance to groups designated foreign terrorist
organizations.
The ruling marks the first court decision to declare a part of
the
post-Sept. 11 anti-terrorism statute unconstitutional, said David Cole,
a Georgetown University law professor who argued the case on behalf of
the Humanitarian Law Project.
Events:
Bill of Rights Day at the Bangor Public Library, December 15, 2003
Bill of Rights Defense Committee
Commemorates 202nd
Anniversary of the Bill of Rights
Despite the stormy
weather, a dozen people gathered at the Bangor Public Library on Monday
afternoon to commemorate Bill of Rights Day. The gathering was
organized by the
Greater Bangor Area Bill of Rights Defense Committee to bring attention
to the
dangers of the USA Patriot Act. After a brief introduction, a statement
of
support from Representative Michael Michaud was read in which he wrote:
“As a
government, I want us to do our duty – to BOTH protect American lives
and avoid
the pitfalls of overstepping constitutional boundaries.” Then a group
of
members performed a short skit describing how the USA Patriot Act
violates the
rights guaranteed by the first, fourth, fifth and sixth amendments by
allowing
secret surveillance of private records and detention of suspects
without a
charge.
The
committee plans to work to pass city council resolutions
to protect civil rights, since they feel is the municipality’s
responsibility
to ensure that its residents feel safe and protected by just laws from
unfair
treatment, invasion of privacy without probable cause, and detentions
without
charges and in secrecy.
(more
photos)
What you can do:
Become
familiar with the UNITING
AND STRENGTHENING AMERICA BY PROVIDING APPROPRIATE TOOLS REQUIRED TO
INTERCEPT AND OBSTRUCT TERRORISM (USA PATRIOT ACT) ACT OF 2001.
Read a Quick
Analysis.
Read
the
Bill of
Rights (click here)
Remember:
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin
Franklin, 1759
Slate Magazine has produced a
four-part series "A Guide to
the Patriot Act: Should you be scared of the Patriot Act?"
By Dahlia Lithwick and Julia
Turner, September 2003
Other
USA Patriot ACT links of interest:
Bill of Rights
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the
freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of
grievances.
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a
free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be
infringed.
Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house,
without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner
to be prescribed by law.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall
not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise
infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury,
except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia,
when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any
person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of
life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a
witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for
public use, without just compensation.
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right
to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and
district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district
shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of
the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the
witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining
witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his
defense.
Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall
exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved,
and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court
of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed,
nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall
not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the
states respectively, or to the people.
For more information:
Geraldole@aol.com
For comments on web page:
mdolanme@hotmail.com